翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ United States v. Univis Lens Co.
・ United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.
・ United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal
・ United States v. Vampire Nation
・ United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez
・ United States v. Virginia
・ United States v. Vuitch
・ United States v. Wade
・ United States v. Warshak
・ United States v. Washington
・ United States v. Watson
・ United States v. Weitzenhoff
・ United States v. Wheeler
・ United States v. Wheeler (1920)
・ United States v. Wheeler (1978)
United States v. White
・ United States v. White Mountain Apache Tribe
・ United States v. Williams
・ United States v. Williams (1992)
・ United States v. Williams (disambiguation)
・ United States v. Willow River Power Co.
・ United States v. Wilson
・ United States v. Winans
・ United States v. Windsor
・ United States v. Winstar Corp.
・ United States v. Wise
・ United States v. Wong Kim Ark
・ United States v. Woods
・ United States v. Wunderlich
・ United States v. Wurzbach


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

United States v. White : ウィキペディア英語版
United States v. White

''United States v. White'', 401 U.S. 745 (1971), was a United States Supreme Court decision which held that recording conversations using concealed radio transmitters worn by informants does not violate the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, and thus does not require a warrant.
==Facts and Procedural History==
Criminal defendant White was convicted of narcotics charges in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. The conviction was based on evidence obtained from recorded conversations in 1965 and 1966 between the defendant White and a government informant wearing a concealed radio transmitter. White appealed the conviction, claiming the conversations were recorded without his permission, that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy (see Katz), and the conversations were recorded without a warrant, violating his Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Thus, White argued that the recorded conversations should not have been admitted as evidence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 405 F.2d 838, reversed the district court and remanded, and certiorari was granted.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「United States v. White」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.